Tom Weidig is host of the famous blog The Stuttering Brain. He is renowned for speaking his mind and is never one to shy away from controversy.
I caught up with Tom to find out more about about his blog, and to discover what he really does think about the state of scientific research into stammering...
What made you start The Stuttering Brain?
That is a good question, and I am not even 100% sure myself. How were the apostles able to write the correct history on Jesus decades afterwards? Here is the story my brain suggests: I was reading a physics blog called The Reference Frame, and I thought why not do the same for stuttering. Blogging appealingly bypasses the gate keepers of the stuttering community like the editors of a stuttering journal or magazine, conference organizer, trustees or influential professors. I was tired of convincing people who did not understand science well. I had interesting and different things to say about stuttering and did not want to tone down my message. I also wanted to promote real debate in stuttering research and new areas like brain imaging and genetics. There was a lack of critical review of research accessible to all, and I thought that I am able to judge research better than many.
Did you ever anticipate that The Stuttering Brain would become so popular?
To be honest, I did expect my blog to do well if only I could keep up the motivation of posting. Luckily, I found this motivation. Blogging gives me a kick and liberates me because I am not hold back by my stuttering. I love blogging. Why did I expect success? First I was the first blog which gave me the first mover advantage. Second, I had the ability to get news on-line quickly and knew that could get the news first due to my big network of contacts in all areas. Third, I tend to have the ability to catch people's attention for good or bad! Fourth, I felt that there was a real need for information, even researchers were badly informed about much research. There was no central place for news on stuttering.
What are your opinions about the stuttering research community?
There are very few really good scientists in the field. I guess stuttering is not as fashionable and cool as string theory, Alzheimer or AIDS. The result is that a lot of research is not very good and dead-end, and good debates are few. Moreover, the atmosphere is intellectually poisoned by therapists-turned-researchers, because they just don't get it due to their lack of rigorous scientific research training. Moreover, being therapists they live in a consensus-based and respect-everyone's-opinion world that is lethal for a healthy scientific debate. But they all mean well.
Do you feel they produce results that can really make a difference in the services available for people who stutter?
They have been researching for decades. Progress is very slow, but there are professional scientists coming into the field, especially in brain imaging and genetics.
As a scientist, I say that I am not interested in making a difference for people who stutter, but I am interested in asking and answering the Why question. If the byproduct is helping stutterers, that is fine. As a stutterer, I do not really care about why I stutter. I just want to get cured or helped and move on to more exciting stuff like black holes, quantum mechanics, neuroscience, finance and so on. So my ultimate goal really is to improve therapy in the selfish goal to help myself!
What changes, if any, do you think need to occur within the stuttering research community to help advance the field in a positive direction?
In physics, we say: Progress never comes with professors changing their opinions, but professors with old opinions dying out! So time is the key! And critical debate. I am amazed at how little debates there are at conferences. It is all about giving your talk and other given their talk but no real debate. I am very confident that the new
generation of researchers are soon taking over from the older professors, most of them not real scientists. Of course, some professors are really good scientists, but other are not but are very good at networking, spreading messages, and politics and thereby blocking the system and misteaching their students.
***
I would like to thank Tom for his time and wish him the best.
